How Should Discrete Choice Experiments with Duration Choice Sets Be Presented for the Valuation of Health States?
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How Should Discrete Choice Experiments with Duration Choice Sets Be Presented for the Valuation of Health States?
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 306-318
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Online
2017-10-31
DOI
10.1177/0272989x17738754
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Health literacy and logical inconsistencies in valuations of hypothetical health states: results from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study
- (2017) Fatima Al Sayah et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Further evidence on EQ-5D-5L preference inversion: a Brazil/U.S. collaboration
- (2017) Benjamin M. Craig et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Are Health State Valuations from the General Public Biased? A Test of Health State Reference Dependency Using Self-assessed Health and an Efficient Discrete Choice Experiment
- (2016) Marcel F. Jonker et al. HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Using Discrete Choice Experiments with Duration to Model EQ-5D-5L Health State Preferences
- (2016) Brendan Mulhern et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Is Dimension Order Important when Valuing Health States Using Discrete Choice Experiments Including Duration?
- (2016) Brendan Mulhern et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- The Impact of Different DCE-Based Approaches When Anchoring Utility Scores
- (2016) Richard Norman et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Order of Presentation of Dimensions Does Not Systematically Bias Utility Weights from a Discrete Choice Experiment
- (2016) Richard Norman et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Words or graphics to present a Discrete Choice Experiment: Does it matter?
- (2015) Jorien Veldwijk et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format
- (2015) R. Norman et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Public Preferences for Prioritizing Preventive and Curative Health Care Interventions: A Discrete Choice Experiment
- (2015) Jeroen Luyten et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report
- (2014) Brendan Mulhern et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature
- (2014) Michael D. Clark et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- A Program of Methodological Research to Arrive at the New International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol
- (2014) Mark Oppe et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Testing a discrete choice experiment including duration to value health states for large descriptive systems: Addressing design and sampling issues
- (2014) Nick Bansback et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- AN AUSTRALIAN DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT TO VALUE EQ-5D HEALTH STATES
- (2013) Rosalie Viney et al. HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Valuing SF-6D Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment
- (2013) Richard Norman et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- A Pilot Discrete Choice Experiment to Explore Preferences for EQ-5D-5L Health States
- (2013) Richard Norman et al. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
- Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values
- (2011) Nick Bansback et al. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS
- The Influence of Graphic Display Format on the Interpretations of Quantitative Risk Information among Adults with Lower Education and Literacy
- (2011) Kirsten J. McCaffery et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
- (2011) M. Herdman et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature
- (2010) Esther W. de Bekker-Grob et al. HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Discrete Choice Modeling for the Quantification of Health States: The Case of the EQ-5D
- (2010) Elly A. Stolk et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreDiscover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversation