4.4 Article

What Factors Influence Women's Perceptions of their Systemic Recurrence Risk after Breast Cancer Treatment?

Journal

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 95-106

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X17724441

Keywords

breast cancer; qualitative methods; risk communication; risk perception; systemic recurrence

Funding

  1. NCCDPHP [5U58DP003875-03] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [HHSN261201000034C, HHSN261201300015C, HHSN261201000035C, HHSN261201000035I, HHSN261201000140C, P01 CA163233] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NCCDPHP CDC HHS [U58 DP003875, U58 DP003862] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA163233] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREV AND HEALTH PROMO [U58DP003875, U58DP003862] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Breast cancer patients' misunderstanding of their systemic cancer recurrence risk has consequences on decision-making and quality of life. Little is known about how women derive their risk estimates. Methods. Using Los Angeles and Georgia's SEER registries (2014-2015), a random sample of early-stage breast cancer patients was sent surveys about 2 to 3 months after surgery (N = 3930; RR, 68%). We conducted an inductive thematic analysis of open-ended responses about why women chose their risk estimates in a uniquely large sub-sample (N = 1,754). Clinician estimates of systemic recurrence risk were provided for patient sub-groups with DCIS and with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk invasive disease. Women's perceived risk of systemic recurrence (0% to 100%) was categorized as overestimation, reasonably accurate estimation, or underestimation (0% for invasive disease) and was compared across identified factors and by clinical presentation. Results. Women identified 9 main factors related to their clinical experience (e.g., diagnosis and testing; treatment) and non-clinical beliefs (e.g., uncertainty; spirituality). Women who mentioned at least one clinical experience factor were significantly less likely to overestimate their risk (12% v. 43%, P < 0.001). Most women who were influenced by communication with a clinician had reasonably accurate recurrence estimates (68%). Uncertainty and family and personal history were associated with overestimation, particularly for women with DCIS (75%; 84%). Spirituality, religion, and faith was associated with an underestimation of risk (63% v. 20%, P < 0.001). Limitations. The quantification of our qualitative results is subject to any biases that may have occurred during the coding process despite rigorous methodology. Conclusions. Patient-clinician communication is important for breast cancer patients' understanding of their numeric risk of systemic recurrence. Clinician discussions about recurrence risk should address uncertainty and relevance of family and personal history.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available