4.7 Article

Delinking indicators on regional industry development and carbon emissions: Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei economic band case

Journal

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages 41-48

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.035

Keywords

Industrial development; Carbon emissions; Decoupling; BTH economic band

Funding

  1. Program National Natural Science Foundation of China [71173017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the two-level Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) method and Tapio index, this paper constructed an expanded decomposition model for decoupling elasticity and effort index of industrial carbon emissions, and further quantitatively analyzed the delinking indicators on industry growth and environmental pressures in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) economic band from 1996 to 2010. The results indicate that: (1) together with the rapid economic growth, industrial energy-related carbon emissions in BTH region rose from 44477.43 x 10(4)t in 1996 to 105602.33 x 10(4)t in 2006 and then declined to 64426.71 x 10(4)t in 2010, with an average annual growth rate of 2.94%. Our results also show that carbon emissions in BTH region were dominated by the secondary industry, which accounted for about 80% of total carbon emissions. (2) Weak decoupling was the main characteristic during the 9th Five-Year Plan period (1996-2000) and 11th Five-Year Plan period (2006-2010), particularly strong decoupling in 2007; while weak coupling was the main characteristic during the 10th Five-Year Plan period (2001-2005). (3) The rapid economic growth was the main factor responsible for industrial decoupling blocking. The energy structure and energy intensity made significant contributions to the industrial decoupling progress. The industrial structure effect had varied considerably over the years without showing a clear trend. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available