4.7 Article

Hepatitis B virus core-related antigen as a surrogate marker for covalently closed circular DNA

Journal

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
Volume 37, Issue 7, Pages 995-1001

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/liv.13346

Keywords

covalently closed circular DNA; hepatitis B; hepatitis B core-related antigen; hepatitis B serum markers; intrahepatic HBV DNA

Funding

  1. Fujirebio Inc., Tokyo, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) is a key to viral persistence in chronic hepatitis B infection. Serum hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is a novel marker for HBV disease. We aimed to determine whether HBcrAg could be a surrogate marker for intrahepatic cccDNA. Methods: Three hundred and five liver biopsies and the corresponding sera collected from 138 nucleos(t)ide analogues-treated patients were analysed. 124 patients had paired liver biopsies at baseline and 1-year post-treatment, and 43 patients had a third biopsy after 6-12years of treatment. Serum HBcrAg, HBV DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and intrahepatic HBV DNA and cccDNA were measured. Results: HBcrAg strongly correlated with cccDNA (r=.70), intrahepatic total HBV DNA (r=.67) and serum HBV DNA (r=.69; all P<.0001). In the 130 samples with undetectable serum HBV DNA, HBcrAg was detectable in 101 (78%) samples, and HBcrAg levels still correlated positively with cccDNA (r=.42, P<.0001). At 6years of therapy, the median logarithmic reduction in HBcrAg was 2.7log kU/mL, which was comparable to the magnitude of reduction in cccDNA. Twenty-one patients had undetectable cccDNA after 6years of treatment, in whom 15 (71%) had detectable HBcrAg (range: 1.2-537kU/mL). Conclusions: Serum HBcrAg is a reliable surrogate marker for intrahepatic cccDNA. HBcrAg could be a very sensitive marker to reflect the cccDNA content and persistence of disease even with the cccDNA levels below the detection limit of assays.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available