4.7 Article

Ibrutinib for patients with rituximab-refractory Waldenstrm's macro globulinaemia (iNNOVATE): an open-label substudy of an international, multicentre, phase 3 trial

Journal

LANCET ONCOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 241-250

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30632-5

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background In the era of widespread rituximab use for Waldenstrm's macro globulinaemia, new treatment options for patients with rituximab-refractory disease are an important clinical need. Ibrutinib has induced durable responses in previously treated patients with Waldenstrm's macro globulinaemia. We assessed the effi cacy and safety of ibrutinib in a population with rituximab-refractory disease. Methods This multicentre, open-label substudy was done at 19 sites in seven countries in adults aged 18 years and older with confi rmed Waldenstrm's macro globulinaemia, refractory to rituximab and requiring treatment. Disease refractory to the last rituximab-containing therapy was defi ned as either relapse less than 12 months since last dose of rituximab or failure to achieve at least a minor response. Key exclusion criteria included: CNS involvement, a stroke or intracranial haemorrhage less than 12 months before enrolment, clinically signifi cant cardiovascular disease, hepatitis B or hepatitis C viral infection, and a known bleeding disorder. Patients received oral ibrutinib 420 mg once daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The substudy was not prospectively powered for statistical comparisons, and as such, all the analyses are descriptive in nature. This study objectives were the proportion of patients with an overall response, progression-free survival, overall survival, haematological improvement measured by haemoglobin, time to next treatment, and patient-reported outcomes according to the Functional Assessment of Cancer TherapyAnemia (FACT-An) and the Euro Qol 5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). All analyses were per protocol. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials. gov, number NCT02165397, and follow-up is ongoing but enrolment is complete. Findings Between Aug 18, 2014, and Feb 18, 2015, 31 patients were enrolled. Median age was 67 years (IQR 58-74); 13 (42%) of 31 patients had high-risk disease per the International Prognostic Scoring System Waldenstrm Macroglobulinaemia, median number of previous therapies was four (IQR 2-6), and all were rituximab-refractory. At a median follow-up of 18.1 months (IQR 17.5-18.9), the proportion of patients with an overall response was 28 [90%] of 31 (22 [71%] of patients had a major response), the estimated 18 month progression-free survival rate was 86% (95% CI 66-94), and the estimated 18 month overall survival rate was 97% (95% CI 79-100). Baseline median haemoglobin of 10.3 g/dL (IQR 9.3-11.7) increased to 114 mu g/dL (10.9-12.4) after 4 weeks of ibrutinib treatment and reached 127 g/dL (11.8-13.4) at week 49. A clinically meaningful improvement from baseline in FACT-An score, anaemia subscale score, and the EQ-5D-5L were reported at all post-baseline visits. Time to next treatment will be presented at a later date. Common grade 3 or worse adverse events included neutropenia in four patients (13%), hypertension in three patients (10%), and anaemia, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhoea in two patients each (6%). Serious adverse events occurred in ten patients (32%) and were most often infections. Five (16%) patients discontinued ibrutinib: three due to progression and two due to adverse events, while the remaining 26 [84%] of patients are continuing ibrutinib at the time of this report. Interpretation The sustained responses and median progression-free survival time, combined with a manageable toxicity profi le observed with single-agent ibrutinib indicate that this chemotherapy-free approach is a potential new treatment choice for patients who had heavily pretreated, rituximab-refractory Waldenstrm's macro globulinaemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available