4.7 Article

FNIH-defined Sarcopenia Predicts Adverse Outcomes Among Community-Dwelling Older People in Taiwan: Results From I-Lan Longitudinal Aging Study

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glx148

Keywords

Aging; All-cause mortality; Sarcopenia; The foundation for the National Institute of Health Biomarkers Consortium Sarcopenia Project

Funding

  1. Aging and Health Research Center, National Yang Ming University
  2. Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 104-2633-B-400-001, MOST 105-3011-B-010-001, MOST 101-2314-B-010-008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To evaluate the predictive validity of sarcopenia defined by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) Sarcopenia Project among Asian older adults. Methods: Data of the I-Lan Longitudinal Aging Study were obtained for analysis. Overall, 1,839 community-dwelling people aged 50 years and older, capable of completing a 6-m walk, with life expectancy of more than 6 months, and not institutionalized at time of data collection were enrolled for study. Data for subjects aged 65 years and older were obtained for study. The outcome measures were all-cause mortality and a composite adverse outcome which includes hospitalizations, emergency department visits, institutionalization, and falls. Results: Data of 728 eligible elderly participants (73.4 +/- 5.4 years; 52.9% males) were analyzed. The prevalence of FNIH-diagnosed sarcopenia was 9.5%: 11.9% males; 6.7% females. Participants having FM-I-defined sarcopenia were considerably older, frailer, more obese, with poorer physical performance than nonsarcopenic subjects (All p < .001); during mean follow-up of 32.9 +/- 8.8 months, they also had 3.8 times higher risk of dying, independent of age, sex, multimorbidity, cognitive function, and nutritional status (hazard ratio = 3.8; 95% confidence interval = 1.26-11.45; p = .018). Moreover, sarcopenia defined by grip strength-BMI ratio (Weak(BMI)) showed stronger association with composite adverse outcomes than traditional handgrip strength (hazard ratio = 1.99; 95% confidence interval = 1.01-3.93; p = .047 vs hazard ratio = 1.80; 95% confidence interval = 0.89-3.62; p = .102 in fully-adjusted model). Conclusion: Among community-dwelling older people in Thiwan, participants with FNIH-defined sarcopenia had a significantly greater risk of all-cause mortality and composite falls, emergency department visits, institutionalization, and hospitalization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available