4.7 Article

Hypermethylation of MEG3 promoter correlates with inactivation of MEG3 and poor prognosis in patients with retinoblastoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-017-1372-8

Keywords

Retinoblastoma; Long non-coding RNA; MEG3; Epigenetic; DNA methylation; Prognosis

Funding

  1. Medical Scientific and Technology Research Foundation of Guangdong Province [A2017569]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Plan Project [JCYJ20170307095222274]
  3. Health and Family Commission of Shenzhen Municipality Foundation [SZBC2017002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In our previous study, we revealed that MEG3 was a tumor suppressor gene in retinoblastoma and inhibited proliferation of retinoblastoma cells by regulating the activity of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Here, we further explored the mechanism of MEG3 inactivation in retinoblastoma. Methods: MSP and qRT-PCR were performed to detect the methylation status of MEG3 promoter and levels of MEG3 expression, respective. To further explore relationship between MEG3 expression and epigenetic modifications, 5-Aza-CdR was used to interfere with DNA methylation. In addition, we evaluated proliferation, apoptosis and the expression of beta-catenin via CCK-8, flow cytometric analysis and western blot analysis, respective. Results: Hypermethylation of MEG3 promoter was observed more frequently in retinoblastoma tissues and was highly associated with low MEG3 expression and poor survival of retinoblastoma patients. We also provided evidence demonstrating that hypermethylation of MEG3 promoter depressed MEG3 expression, promoted proliferation, inhibited apoptosis and increased beta-catenin expression of retinoblastoma cells in vitro. Conclusions: Our present study indicates that promoter silencing by hypermethylation may account for the loss of MEG3 expression and predict poor prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available