4.7 Article

Water status and must composition in grapevine cv. Chardonnay with different soils and topography and a mini meta-analysis of the 13C/water potentials correlation

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 691-697

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8516

Keywords

Vitis vinifera; carbon isotopic discrimination; water stress; terroir; slope

Funding

  1. Conseil Regional de Bourgogne
  2. Bureau Interprofessionnel des Vins de Bourgogne (BIVB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDThe measurement of carbon isotopic discrimination in grape sugars at harvest (C-13) is an integrated assessment of water status during ripening. It is an efficient alternative to assess variability in the field and discriminate between management zones in precision viticulture, but further work is needed to completely understand the signal. RESULTSThis work, spanning over 3years, performed in a hillslope toposequence in Burgundy, delineates the relationships between main soil properties (gravel amount, slope, texture) and the grapevine water status assessed by C-13. The highest C-13, indicating most severe water deficit, was recorded in gravelly soils on steep slopes. The amount of sugars and malic and tartaric acids was also related to C-13. The relationship between C-13 and predawn leaf water potentials ((pd)) was also investigated, because the absolute values of measured C-13 were lower than the values currently found in the literature. CONCLUSIONSA mini-meta-analysis was performed, which showed that the slope of the relationships between minimum (pd) and C-13 was stable across studies (a change of 1 parts per thousand in C-13 corresponded to a change of -0.2MPa in the minimum (pd)), while the intercept of the comparison C-13/(pd) changed, probably because of genetic variations between varieties, or environmental differences. (c) 2017 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available