4.5 Article

Neurosarcoidosis according to Zajicek and Scolding criteria: 15 probable and definite cases, their treatment and outcomes

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 379, Issue -, Pages 84-88

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.05.055

Keywords

Neurosarcoidosis; Diagnosis criteria; Magnetic resonance imaging; Treatment; Outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Neurosarcoidosis occurs in about 5% to 15% of patients with sarcoidosis. The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize a cohort of neurosarcoidosis patients and to review the largest previously reported neurosarcoidosis case series. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled all patients with the diagnosis of probable or definitive neurosarcoidosis according to Zajicek and Scolding criteria, followed at the neurology department of a tertiary center in Portugal from January 1989 to December 2015. Results: A total of 15 patients presented a diagnosis of probable or definitive neurosarcoidosis, with a mean age at time of diagnosis of 38.5 years. The presenting neurologic syndrome was isolated cranial neuropathy, aseptic meningitis, myelitis, brain parenchymal lesion, myelorradiculitis and meningomyelorradiculitis. MRI study most often presented different enhancing lesions and the CSF analysis commonly revealed a lymphocytic pleocytosis and raised proteins. Thirteen patients had histopathology confirmation of systemic sarcoidosis and one preformed a spinal cord biopsy. Corticosteroids was the most often used treatment alone or in combination with immunosuppressive drugs. After a mean follow-up of 86.1 months, the majority of patients fully recovered to a mRankin 0. Discussion: Fully comprehension of neurosarcoidosis is still a challenge due to its rarity and limited number of large published series, which renders the epidemiological study of this disease very difficult. In this study, the thoroughly medical records review and the summarize of previous published cohorts allow to add some information in the epidemiological and clinical knowledge of this entity. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available