4.2 Article

The Impact of Rehabilitation Frequencies in the First Year after Stroke on the Risk of Recurrent Stroke and Mortality

Journal

JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages 2755-2762

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.06.047

Keywords

Stroke; rehabilitation; mortality; hip fracture; pneumonia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Rehabilitation is essential for all poststroke patients to improve self-care ability. However, whether an increased frequency of rehabilitation reduces poststroke adverse events remains undetermined. Methods: We recruited 4899 patients with newly diagnosed ischemic stroke between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2008, from our database and divided them into 3 groups according to their Charlson Comorbidity Index, and they were further categorized into 3 groups of different rehabilitation frequencies during their first year after stroke. Clinical adverse events including recurrent stroke, hip fracture, pneumonia, and all-cause mortality were analyzed by Cox regression analysis to investigate the protective effects of aggressive rehabilitation. Results: We discovered that aggressive rehabilitation in the first year after stroke was significantly associated with a lower incidence of recurrent stroke and all-cause mortality despite the severity of patients' comorbidities. Further Cox regression analysis revealed decreased hazard ratios to develop recurrent stroke and all-cause mortality in patients with more intensive rehabilitation (P for trend <.05). However, no significant associations between rehabilitation frequency and pneumonia and hip fracture were identified in our study. Conclusion: Intensive rehabilitation during the first year after stroke should be recommended to prevent detrimental adverse events for stroke survivors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available