4.6 Article

Hybrid vinyl silane and P123 template sol-gel derived carbon silica membrane for desalination

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOL-GEL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages 280-289

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10971-017-4562-1

Keywords

Interlayer-free; Vinyl silane precursor; P123 template; Carbon silica; Desalination membrane

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the China Central Universities [2017QNB05]
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP110101185]
  3. ARC [DE150101687, FT130100405]
  4. Australian Research Council [DE150101687] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesoporous, interlayer-free, hybrid carbon-silica membranes based on organosilica of triethoxyvinylsilane (TEVS) and pluronic triblock copolymer poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) (P123) were successfully prepared by modified acid-base catalysed sol-gel method. Xerogels and membranes were pyrolyzed under inert conditions in vacuum and nitrogen to form the hybrid carbon silica structures. FTIR analyses showed the presence of Si-C groups in addition to silanol and siloxane groups for samples pyrolysed at 450 A degrees C. Vacuum pyrolyzed xerogels produced slightly higher pore volumes than that of the nitrogen pyrolyzed samples. As a result, the vacuum pyrolyzed membranes produced highest water fluxes compared to the nitrogen pyrolyzed membranes. Best water fluxes were measured at 6.26 (1 wt%, 60 A degrees C) and 2.92 (15 wt%, 60 A degrees C) L m(-2) h(-1) with salt rejections of 99.7% and 99.9%, respectively. This study demonstrates that the combined strategy of a sol-gel synthesis containing vinyl organosilica and polymeric template followed by vacuum pyrolysis conferred the carbonized silica membranes with excellent selectivity of water from the hydrated salt ions and reasonable water fluxes for water desalination applications. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available