4.6 Article

Total petroleum hydrocarbons and heavy metals in road-deposited sediments in Tijuana, Mexico

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages 2873-2886

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11368-017-1778-1

Keywords

Heavy metals; Pollution; Road-deposited sediment; Tijuana; Total petroleum hydrocarbons

Funding

  1. Universidad Autonoma de Baja California (UABC) through their 18th internal competition for research [3884]
  2. Mexican Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) [541245]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study was carried out to evaluate the concentration of heavy metals (Pb, Cu, Cr, Cd, and Hg) and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in road-deposited sediments (RDS) from Tijuana, Mexico, and identify their possible sources. Thirty RDS samples were randomly collected during the dry season using a brush and dustpan and classified according to construction material, traffic intensity, and land use. Soil samples were collected from a nonurban area and their concentrations were used as background values. For TPH, the samples were quantified gravimetrically after Soxhlet extraction, whereas heavy metals were extracted by acid digestion and their concentrations were measured by atomic absorption spectrometry. The mean TPH concentrations for RDS were 4208 mg kg(-1) and ranged from 1186 to 9982 mg kg(-1). For heavy metals, mean concentrations were 31.8, 50.2, 17.1, 0.1, and 0.1 mg kg(-1) for Pb, Cu, Cr, Cd, and Hg, respectively. The Igeo results showed that RDS from Tijuana are moderately to strongly polluted with Pb and Cu and moderately polluted with Cr. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that Pb, Cu, and Cr could have their origin in tire wear, brake pads, bearings, and bushings. The findings of this study revealed that RDS from Tijuana are polluted with TPH and heavy metals and that their principal sources are anthropogenic activities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available