4.3 Article

Intravenous tranexamic acid reduces total blood loss in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages 1383-1389

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.01.005

Keywords

tranexamic acid; antifibrinolytic; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; blood loss; blood transfusion; prospective randomized trial

Funding

  1. Biomet
  2. DePuy, a Johnson & Johnson Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are at risk of significant perioperative blood loss. To date, few studies have examined the effectiveness of tranexamic acid (TXA) to reduce blood loss in the setting of RTSA. Methods: In a prospective, double-blinded, single-surgeon trial, we analyzed 102 patients undergoing primary RTSA who were randomized to receive intravenous TXA (n = 53) or placebo (n = 49). Calculated total blood loss, drain output, and hemoglobin (Hb) drop were measured. Postoperative transfusions were recorded. Complications were assessed out to 6 weeks postoperatively. Results: Total blood loss was less for the TXA group (1122.4 +/- 411.6 mL) than the placebo group (1472.6 +/- 475.4 mL, P < .001). Total drain output was less for the TXA group (221.4 +/- 126.2 mL) than the placebo group (371.9 +/- 166.3 mL, P < .001). Total Hb loss was less in the TXA group (154.57 +/- 60.29 g) compared with the placebo group (200.1 +/- 65.5 g, P = .001). Transfusion rates differed significantly at postoperative day 1; however, overall transfusion rates did not vary significantly. Seven patients (14.3%) and 12 units were transfused in the placebo group compared with 3 patients (5.7%) and 3 units in the TXA group. Discussion: In this cohort of patients undergoing primary RTSA, TXA was effective in reducing total drain output, total Hb loss, and total blood loss compared with a placebo control. (C) 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available