4.8 Article

Quantitative investigation of the gassing behavior in cylindrical Li4Ti5O12 batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 343, Issue -, Pages 564-570

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.073

Keywords

Lithium titanate; Gassing behavior; Quantitative analysis; Solid electrolyte interface film; Lithium ion battery

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21373257, 21603260]
  2. Scientific Research Projects of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [11595800700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Li4Ti5O12 gassing behavior is a critical limitation for applications in lithium-ion batteries. The impact of electrode/electrolyte interface, as well as the underlying mechanisms involved during the gassing process, are still debated. Herein, a quantitative evolution of the internal pressure in 18650-type cylindrical Li4Ti5O12 batteries is investigated using a self-designed pressure testing device. The results indicate that the internal pressure significantly increases during the formation cycle and continues growing during the following cycles. After several charge and discharge cycles, the pressure finally reaches constant. Simultaneously, the formation of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) film is also investigated. The results suggest that the initial formed SEI film has a thickness of 24 nm, and is observed to shrink during the following cycles. Furthermore, no apparent increase in thickness accompanying the pressure rising is noticed. These comparative investigations reveal a possible mechanism of the gassing behavior. We suggest that the gassing behavior is associated with side reactions which are determined by the potential of the Li4Ti5O12 electrode, where the active sites of the electrode/electrolyte interface manage the extent of the reaction. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available