4.8 Article

Zirconium oxide nanotube-Nafion composite as high performance membrane for all vanadium redox flow battery

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 337, Issue -, Pages 36-44

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.113

Keywords

Vanadium redox flow battery; Nafion composite membrane; ZrO2 nanotubes; Electrospinning; Vanadium crossover

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [2014R1A1A2-057056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A high-performance composite membrane for vanadium redox flow battery (VRB) consisting of ZrO2 nanotubes (ZrNT) and perfluorosulfonic acid (Nafion) was fabricated. The VRB operated with a composite (Nafion-ZrNT) membrane showed the improved ion-selectivity (ratio of proton conductivity to permeability), low self-discharge rate, high discharge capacity and high energy efficiency in comparison with a pristine commercial Nafion-117 membrane. The incorporation of zirconium oxide nanotubes in the Nafion matrix exhibits high proton conductivity (95.2 mS cm(-1)) and high oxidative stability (99.9%). The Nafion-ZrNT composite membrane exhibited low vanadium ion permeability (3.2 x 10(-9) cm(2) min(-1)) and superior ion selectivity (2.95 x 10(7) S min cm(-3)). The VRB constructed with a Nafion-ZrNT composite membrane has lower self-discharge rate maintaining an open-circuit voltage of 1.3 V for 330 h relative to a pristine Nafion membrane (29 h). The discharge capacity of Nafion-ZrNT membrane (987 mAh) was 3.5-times higher than Nafion-117 membrane (280 mAh) after 100 charge-discharge cycles. These superior properties resulted in higher coulombic and voltage efficiencies with Nafion-ZrNT membranes compared to VRB with Nafion-117 membrane at a 40 mA cm(-2) current density. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available