4.8 Article

Maximizing the power density of aqueous electrochemical flow cells with in operando deposition

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 339, Issue -, Pages 80-85

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.053

Keywords

Flow cell; Fuel cell; Flow battery; Mass transport; Kinetics; Power density

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Western Economic Diversification Canada
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  4. British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To transition toward sustainable energy systems, next generation power sources must provide high power density at minimum cost. Using inexpensive and environmentally friendly fabrication methods, this work describes a room temperature electrochemical flow cell with a maximum power density of 2.01 W cm(-2) or 13.4 W cm(-3). In part, this is achieved by minimizing ohmic resistance through decreased electrode spacing, implementation of current collectors and improvement of electrolyte conductivity. The majority of the performance gain is provided by a novel in operando dynamic flowing deposition method for which the cell design has been optimized. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are deposited dynamically at the entrance of and within the carbon paper electrodes during operation of the cell. A natural equilibrium is reached between deposition and detachment of CNTs at which the electrochemical surface area and pore size distribution of the flow-through porous electrodes are greatly enhanced. In this way, the novel deposition method more than doubles the power density of the cell and sets a new performance benchmark for what is practically attainable with aqueous electrochemical flow cells. Overall, it is expected that the design and operation methods illustrated here will enable a wide range of electrochemical flow cell technologies to achieve optimal performance. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available