4.6 Article

Effect of Competition and Treatment with Inhibitor of Ethylene Perception on Growth and Hormone Content of Lettuce Plants

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 450-459

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00344-016-9653-7

Keywords

Lettuce; Competition; Growth; Root-to-shoot ratio; Auxins; Ethylene sensitivity; Abscisic acid; Cytokinins

Categories

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research [14-04-00775]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We elucidated the effect of increased planting density (single and grouped competing plants) on concentrations of auxin, abscisic acid, and cytokinins in normal lettuce plants and in those with ethylene perception inhibited by 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP). An attempt was made to relate the changes in hormone concentration induced by competition and inhibition of ethylene sensitivity to growth responses of lettuce planting. The results showed changes in concentrations of auxins, cytokinins, and ABA in the response of lettuce to crowding. Accumulation of ABA in shoots was likely to contribute to inhibition of transpiration of the plants grown in the presence of neighbors. This assumption was supported by the results of application of an inhibitor of ABA synthesis (fluridone and carotenoid biosynthesis herbicide) resulting in increased transpiration of grouped, but not single plants. Increased planting density led to the decline in root auxins paralleled by inhibition of root growth. This effect was likely to be due to decreased auxin transport to the roots from the shoots suggested by accumulation of auxins in the shoots and inhibition of root growth by application of the auxin transport inhibitor [N-(1-naphtyl) phtalamic acid (NPA)]. Importance of the changes in hormone concentrations was confirmed by data showing that disturbance of auxin and cytokinin distribution detected in MCP-treated plants was accompanied by corresponding modification of the growth response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available