4.6 Article

A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Model of Electrostatics in Multiply Charged Quantum Dots

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 121, Issue 46, Pages 26086-26095

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08224

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [CHE-1464497, CHE-1506014, DMR-1719797]
  2. NSF Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure [OAC-1663636]
  3. STF at the University of Washington
  4. National Science Foundation [MRI-1624430]
  5. Division Of Chemistry
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1624430] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Chemistry
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1464497] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a general model for describing the properties of excess electrons in multiply charged quantum dots (QDs). Key factors governing Fermi-level energies and electron density distributions are investigated by treating carrier densities, charge compensation, and various material and dielectric medium properties as independently tunable parameters. Electronic interactions are described using a mean-field electrostatic potential calculable through Gauss's Law by treating the quantum dot as a sphere of uniform charge density. This classical approximation modifies the Particle in a Sphere Schrodinger equation for a square well potential and reproduces the broken degeneracy and Fermi-level energies expected from experiment and first-principles methods. Several important implications emerge from this model: (i) excess electron density drifts substantially toward the QD surfaces with high electron densities and large radii and when solvated by a high dielectric medium. (ii) The maximum density of the conduction-band electrons depends strongly on the dielectric strength of the solvent and the electron affinity and dielectric strength of the QD material. (iii) Fermi-level energies stabilize with charge-balancing cations in close proximity to the QD surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available