4.6 Article

Molecular Mechanisms for Cyclodextrin-Promoted Methane Hydrate Formation in Water

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 121, Issue 38, Pages 20967-20975

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03338

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Project of Shenzhen, China [JCYJ20160513103756736]
  2. Shenzhen Peacock Plan Research Grant [KQJSCX20170330151956264]
  3. Economy, Trade and Information Commission of Shenzhen Municipality [HY-CYPT20140507010002, SZHY2014-B01-001, 201411201645511650]
  4. Special Program for Applied Research on Super Computation of the NSFC Guangdong Joint Fund (the second phase)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cyclodextrins were used as environmentally friendly additives to overcome the slow kinetics of hydrate formation that limited the industrial application of gas hydrate technology. Microsecond molecular dynamics simulations were performed to identify the degree and the underlying mechanisms of the cyclodextrin effects on the methane hydrate formation rate by the four-body order parameter and molecular configurations and to clarify the hydrate structure in the presence of cyclodextrin by face-saturated incomplete cage analysis. Overall results indicated that the addition of beta-cyclodextrin in water facilitatedthe hydrate growth rate, promoted the formation of thermodynamically stable hydrate structure, and enhanced the methane storage capacity. It highlighted the role of cyclodextrin to facilitate the formation of water channel bridging hydrate and water (at low ratio of gas to water) and to increase thezas water interfacial curvature (at high ratio of gas to water) on the accelerated kinetics of hydrate growth. The advantages of the cyclodextrin-promoted gas hydrate approach for gas storage were also highlighted by comparing it with the gas hydrate formation using other additives and the gas cyclodextrin complexation method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available