4.5 Review

A Critical View on In Vitro Analysis of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) Transport Kinetics

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 106, Issue 9, Pages 2257-2264

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.04.022

Keywords

drug transport; ABC transporters; P-glycoprotein; Michaelis-Menten kinetics; drug interactions; ADME; in vitro models

Funding

  1. Lundbeck Foundation Research Initiative on Brain Barriers and Drug Delivery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transport proteins expressed in the different barriers of the human body can have great implications on absorption, distribution, and excretion of drug compounds. Inhibition or saturation of a transporter can potentially alter these absorbtion, distribution, metabolism and elimination properties and thereby also the pharmacokinetic profile and bioavailability of drug compounds. P-glycoprotein (P-gp, ABCB1) is an efflux transporter which is present in most of the barriers of the body, including the small intestine, the bloodebrain barrier, the liver, and the kidney. In all these tissues, P-gp may mediate efflux of drug compounds and may also be a potential site for drug-drug interactions. Consequently, there is a need to be able to predict the saturation and inhibition of P-gp and other transporters in vivo. For this purpose, Michaelis-Menten steady-state analysis has been applied to estimate kinetic parameters, such as K-m and V-max, for carrier-mediated transport, whereas half-maximal inhibitor concentration (IC50) and the disassociation constant for an inhibitor/P-gp complex (K-i) have been determined to estimate P-gp inhibition. This review addresses in vitro methods commonly used to study P-gp transport kinetics and aims at providing a critical evaluation of the application of steady-state Michaelis-Menten analysis of kinetic parameters for substrate/P-gp interactions. (C) 2017 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available