4.0 Article

Should We Pay Attention to the Delay Before Admission to a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit for Children With Cancer? Impact on 1-Month Mortality. A Report From the French Children's Oncology Study Group, GOCE

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages E244-E248

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000816

Keywords

time delay; cancer; children; pediatric intensive care; mortality; complications

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute complications requiring admission to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are frequent for children with cancer. Our objective was to determine early prognostic factors of mortality in a cohort of children with cancer hospitalized in PICU for acute complications and particularly to assess whether the delay before admission to a PICU is an early predictor of mortality. We conduct a retrospective multicenter analysis. All patients transferred in PICU for acute complications between January 2002 and December 2012 were included. One-month mortality of the 224 patients analyzed was 24.5%. Delay before PICU admission was a significant prognostic factor of 1-month mortality with nonsurvivors experiencing a longer median delay than survivors (24 vs. 12 h, respectively, P < 0.05). Time from diagnosis to PICU admission (P < 0.001), hematopoietic stem cell transplant (P < 0.05), the duration of neutropenia (P < 0.01), infection type (P < 0.001), number of organ dysfunctions (P < 0.001), and reaching any grade 4 toxicity before PICU admission (P < 0.001) also affected mortality rate at 1-month post-PICU discharge. In the multivariate analysis, only reaching any grade 4 toxicity before PICU admission influenced 1-month mortality (odds ratio, 2.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-4.96; P < 0.05). These results suggest that PICU admission before severe impairment leads to a better outcome for children with cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available