4.5 Article

A novel multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for recommendation systems

Journal

JOURNAL OF PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages 53-63

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2016.10.014

Keywords

Recommendation algorithm; Multi-objective optimization; Topic diversity; Genetic operator

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61472258, 61402294, 61572328]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [S2013040012895]
  3. Foundation for Distinguished Young Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong, China [2013LYM_0076]
  4. Major Fundamental Research Project in the Science and Technology Plan of Shenzhen [JCYJ20140509172609162, JCYJ20140828163633977, JCYJ20140418181958501, JCYJ20150630105452814, JCYJ20160310095523765, JCYJ20160307111232895]
  5. UK Visual Information Processing Lab

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays, the recommendation algorithm has been used in lots of information systems and Internet applications. The recommendation algorithm can pick out the information that users are interested in. However, most traditional recommendation algorithms only consider the precision as the evaluation metric of the performance. Actually, the metrics of diversity and novelty are also very important for recommendation. Unfortunately, there is a conflict between precision and diversity in most cases. To balance these two metrics, some multi-objective evolutionary algorithms are applied to the recommendation algorithm. In this paper, we firstly put forward a kind of topic diversity metric. Then, we propose a novel multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for recommendation systems, called PMOEA. In PMOEA, we present a new probabilistic genetic operator. Through the extensive experiments, the results demonstrate that the combination of PMOEA and the recommendation algorithm can achieve a good balance between precision and diversity. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available