4.7 Article

Microstructural comparison of effects of hafnium and titanium additions in spark-plasma-sintered Fe-based oxide-dispersion strengthened alloys

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
Volume 487, Issue -, Pages 433-442

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.02.030

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/H018921/1]
  2. RCUK Energy Programme [EP/1501045]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H018921/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/H018921/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two oxide dispersion strengthened alloys: 14Cr-0.25Y(2)O(3)-0.22Hf (wt.%) and Fe-14Cr-0.25Y(2)O(3)-0.4Ti (wt.%) were fabricated by mechanical alloying and subsequently consolidated by spark plasma sintering (SPS). Electron backscatter diffraction showed grain sizes in the range 0.5-15 mu m in both alloys. Transmission electron microscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy showed a homogeneous distribution of nano-oxides precipitated during SPS. Using high resolution transmission electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and atom probe tomography, several different oxide phases were found in both alloys, but the majority of dispersoids were Y-Hf-O type in Fe-14Cr-0.25Y(2)O(3)-0.22Hf and Y-Ti-O type in Fe-14Cr-0.25Y(2)O(3)-0.4Ti. There were a variety of orientation relationships between the different dispersoids and the ferritic matrix. Both alloys had dispersoid densities of similar to 10(23)/m(3), with average diameters of 4.3 nm and 3.5 nm in the 0.22Hf and 0.4Ti containing alloys, respectively. Per atom added, Hf (0.07 at.%) is suggested to be more potent than Ti (0.46 at.%) in refining the nano-oxides. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available