4.1 Article

Improved local polynomial estimation in time series regression

Journal

JOURNAL OF NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICS
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 1-27

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10485252.2017.1402118

Keywords

Central limit theorem; local polynomial estimation; pre-whitening; strong mixing; time series regression

Funding

  1. International Max Planck Research School for Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Jena

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a modification of local polynomial estimation which improves the efficiency of the conventional method when the observation errors are correlated. The procedure is based on a pre-transformation of the data as a generalization of the pre-whitening procedure introduced by Xiao et al. [(2003), More Efficient Local Polynomial Estimation in Nonparametric Regression with Autocorrelated Errors', Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 980-992]. While these authors assumed a linear process representation for the error process, we avoid any structural assumption. We further allow the regressors and the errors to be dependent. More importantly, we show that the inclusion of both leading and lagged variables in the approximation of the error terms outperforms the best approximation based on lagged variables only. Establishing its asymptotic distribution, we show that the proposed estimator is more efficient than the standard local polynomial estimator. As a by-product we prove a suitable version of a central limit theorem which allows us to improve the asymptotic normality result for local polynomial estimators by Masry and Fan [(1997), Local Polynomial Estimation of Regression Functions for Mixing Processes', Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 24, 165-179]. A simulation study confirms the efficiency of our estimator on finite samples. An application to climate data also shows that our new method leads to an estimator with decreased variability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available