4.7 Article

Evidence for an Evolutionarily Conserved Memory Coding Scheme in the Mammalian Hippocampus

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 37, Issue 10, Pages 2795-2801

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3057-16.2017

Keywords

neural coding; neuroethology; primate; rodent; spatial cognition; virtual reality

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AG003376]
  2. McKnight Brain Research Foundation [MH060884]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Alberta Innovates Health Solution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Decades of research identify the hippocampal formation as central to memory storage and recall. Events are stored via distributed population codes, the parameters of which (e. g., sparsity and overlap) determine both storage capacity and fidelity. However, it remains unclear whether the parameters governing information storage are similar between species. Because episodic memories are rooted in the space in which they are experienced, the hippocampal response to navigation is often used as a proxy to study memory. Critically, recent studies in rodents that mimic the conditions typical of navigation studies in humans and nonhuman primates (i. e., virtual reality) show that reduced sensory input alters hippocampal representations of space. The goal of this study was to quantify this effect and determine whether there are commonalities in information storage across species. Using functional molecular imaging, we observe that navigation in virtual environments elicits activity in fewer CA1 neurons relative to real-world conditions. Conversely, comparable neuronal activity is observed in hippocampus regionCA3and the dentate gyrus under both conditions. Surprisingly, weal so find evidence that the absolute number of neurons used to represent an experience is relatively stable between nonhuman primates and rodents. We propose that this convergence reflects an optimal ensemble size for episodic memories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available