4.5 Article

Haplodeficiency of Cathepsin D does not affect cerebral amyloidosis and autophagy in APP/PS1 transgenic mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 142, Issue 2, Pages 297-304

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.14048

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Amyloid-beta; Cathepsin D; LAMP2; LC3; p62

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS064090, AG031846]
  2. NIH/NIA [T32 AG0297969]
  3. Center on Aging Fesler-Lampert Chair in Aging Studies grant
  4. College of Pharmacy GAP grant
  5. Academic Health Center Faculty Research Development Program of the University of Minnesota
  6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  7. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS064090]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Autophagy and lysosomal function are important for protein homeostasis and their dysfunction have been associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Increased immunoreactivities of an important lysosomal protease, cathepsin D (Cat D), are evident in amyloid plaques and neurons in patients with AD. This study tests the hypothesis that deleting one allele of the cathepsin D gene (Ctsd) impacts cerebral beta-amyloidosis in amyloid-beta precursor protein (APP)sw/PS1dE9 (APP/PS1) double transgenic mice. Despite a significant 38% decrease in Cat D level in APP/PS1/Ctsd(+/-) compared with APP/PS1/Ctsd(+/+) mice, no changes in steady state levels and deposition of A beta were found in the brain. There were also no differences in APP processing, the levels of two other A beta-degrading proteases, the levels of autophagy related protein, such as LAMP2, P62, LC3-I, LC3-II, and Beclin-1, or the markers of neuroinflammation, observed between the APP/PS1/Ctsd+/+ and APP/PS1/Ctsd+/- mice. Our findings demonstrate that in wild-type mice, Cat D protein levels are either in excess or redundant with other factors in the brain, and at least one allele of Ctsd is dispensable for cerebral beta-amyloidosis and autophagy in APP/PS1 transgenic mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available