4.6 Article

Clinical manifestations, risk factors and prognosis of patients with Morganella morganii sepsis

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY IMMUNOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 443-448

Publisher

ELSEVIER TAIWAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2017.08.010

Keywords

Morganella morganii bacteremia; Sepsis; Polymicrobial bacteremia; Soft tissue infection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: There are few studies of Morganella bacteremia. We evaluated risk factors and outcome of patients with Morganella bacteremia. Methods: Medical records of patients with Morganella bacteremia were reviewed (1997-2014). Control group patients with Escherichia coli sepsis were matched by year of diagnosis and infection acquisition site. Results: The study group included 136 adult patients. Mean age and gender of study and control groups were similar. Complicated soft tissue infection was more prevalent in the study group (30% versus 3.2%, p < 0.05). The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was higher in the study group (4.3 +/- 2.5 versus 3.4 +/- 2.8, p < 0.05). Only 78 (62%) of the study patients versus 101 (83%) of the control group (p < 0.05), received appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment. A significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate (42% versus 25%, p < 0.05) as well as longer length of stay (25 +/- 22 versus 14 +/- 16 days, p < 0.05) was observed in the study group. Multivariate analysis revealed that a debilitative state, a CCI > 4, septic shock and a clinical syndrome other than UTI were all significant risk factors for mortality (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients with Morganella morganii sepsis had more co-morbidities and a worse degree of sepsis. There is an increased risk of inappropriate empirical treatment, longer hospitalization and higher death rate. Copyright (C) 2017, Taiwan Society of Microbiology. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available