4.7 Article

Phosphoric acid doped crosslinked polybenzimidazole (PBI-OO) blend membranes for high temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 544, Issue -, Pages 416-424

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.049

Keywords

Polybenzimidazole; Crosslinked membranes; Friedel-Crafts reaction; Phosphoric acid; HT PEMFC

Funding

  1. Korea-Denmark green technology cooperative research program (KIST, GTC) [2N42290, 2E26600]
  2. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea [2E26600] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ionically crosslinked acid/base blend membranes of PBI-OO and a sulfonated polysulfone can be covalently crosslinked through aromatic sulfone groups, which form in a thermally induced Friedel-Crafts reaction. Here we systematically compare a series of blend membranes before and after curing. Even though the cured membranes have a lower phosphoric acid uptake even at increased doping time and temperature, they have an improved conductivity and therefore fuel cell performance than the ionically crosslinked membranes. For example, a covalently crosslinked blend membrane containing 5% of the acid component (c-BM 1) reached a conductivity of 260 mS/cm at 160 degrees C and a relative humidity of 5%, even though the PA uptake was just 266 wt%. In the fuel cell (H-2, air, 160 degrees C), this membrane yielded a peak power density of 452 mW cm(-2), about 100 mW cm(-2) above that of the commercial meta-PBI membrane. In a long term stability test, the ionically crosslinked membrane ucBM 1 already failed within 100 h, while the cured c-BM 1 membrane was much more stable. A cured membrane with less PA and higher amount of the acid blend component (c-BM 3) gave a stable performance for over 1000 h, proving that thermally induced sulfone crosslinking strongly increases the stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available