4.7 Article

Impact of treatment with saxagliptin on glycaemic stability and β-cell function in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 study

Journal

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 487-494

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12445

Keywords

clinical trial; dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; glycaemic control; type 2 diabetes; beta cell

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  3. Novo Nordisk
  4. Amarin
  5. Eisai
  6. Ethicon
  7. Medtronic
  8. Roche
  9. Sanofi Aventis
  10. The Medicines Company
  11. TIMI Study and Brigham and Women's Hospital from AstraZeneca
  12. Daiichi-Sankyo
  13. GlaxoSmithKline
  14. Johnson and Johnson
  15. Bayer Healthcare
  16. Gilead
  17. Merck
  18. Boehringer Ingelheim
  19. Lexicon
  20. Arena
  21. St. Jude's Medical
  22. Forest Pharmaceuticals
  23. Boston Clinical Research Institute
  24. Covance
  25. University of Calgary
  26. Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology
  27. Sanofi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To study the effects of saxagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, on glycaemic stability and beta-cell function in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial. Methods: We randomized 16 492 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) to saxagliptin or placebo, added to current antidiabetic medications, and followed them for a median of 2.1 years. Glycaemic instability was defined by: (i) a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) increase of >= 0.5% post-randomization; (ii) the initiation of new antidiabetic medications for >= 3 months; or (iii) an increase in dose of oral antidiabetic medication or >= 25% increase in insulin dose for >= 3 months. beta-cell function was assessed according to fasting homeostatic model 2 assessment of beta-cell function (HOMA-2 beta) values at baseline and at year 2 in patients not treated with insulin. Results: Compared with placebo, participants treated with saxagliptin had a reduction in the development of glycaemic instability (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.74; p < 0.0001). In participants treated with saxagliptin compared with placebo, the occurrence of an HbA1c increase of >= 0.5% was reduced by 35.2%; initiation of insulin was decreased by 31.7% and the increases in doses of an oral antidiabetic drug or insulin were reduced by 19.5 and 23.5%, respectively (all p < 0.0001). At 2 years, HOMA-2 beta values decreased by 4.9% in participants treated with placebo, compared with an increase of 1.1% in those treated with saxagliptin (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Saxagliptin improved glycaemia and prevented the reduction in HOMA-2 beta values. Saxagliptin may reduce the usual decline in beta-cell function in T2D, thereby slowing diabetes progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available