4.6 Article

Friction assessment in uniaxial compression test: A new evaluation method based on local bulge profile

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 243, Issue -, Pages 282-290

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.12.023

Keywords

Uniaxial compression test; Friction evaluation; Metal forming

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51575449]
  2. Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing (NWPU), China [104-QP-2014]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Barreling in uniaxial compression test is widely used for friction evaluation, flow stress correction and unequal deformation quantification. However, the friction evaluation methods based on the maximum and top radii of the deformed cylinder are valid only at low level of friction because the contact of lateral surface with anvil desensitizes barreling to friction. To avoid this disadvantage, the effect of friction on bulge profile was investigated by finite element (FE) simulation and experiment. It was found that the slope of bulge curvature at the contact point is more sensitive to friction than other geometrical parameters. Though FE simulation tends to underestimate the side surface foldover, the predicted local bulge profile near the contact point is in good agreement with experiment. The slope of bulge curvature at the contact point is a good parameter to quantify friction condition and it can be measured by fitting to the local bulge profile. The calibration curves were obtained by FE simulation. The effects of material properties and initial aspect ratio on calibration were revealed. An empirical model considering the effect of material properties was developed for rapid friction estimation. The proposed method was applied to different lubricating conditions and surface states for three different materials. It shows good applicability in upsetting type deformation with normal pressure close to the flow stress. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available