4.6 Article

Influence of Activation Methods on Strength and Chloride Resistance of Concrete Using Calcium Carbide Residue-Fly Ash Mixture as a New Binder

Journal

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001808

Keywords

Fly ash; Calcium carbide residue; Compressive strength; Chloride resistance; Activation

Funding

  1. Petchra Pra Jom Klao Ph.D. Scholarship, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi
  2. Thailand Research Fund (TRF) under TRF Grant for New Researcher Scholar [TRG 5780073]
  3. Thailand Research Fund (TRF) under the TRF Senior Research Scholar [RTA5780004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research aimed to investigate the compressive strength and chloride resistance of concrete made with 30% of calcium carbide residue (CCR) and 70% fly ash (FA) as a binder without portland cement. There were three activation methods to promote strength development of a new cementing material: (1)adding 1% of NaOH by weight of binder; (2)curing concrete at elevated temperature of 60 degrees C; and (3)increasing the fineness of binder by grinding. All concretes were tested to determine the compressive strengths at 1, 3, 7, 28, and 90days. The chloride resistance of the concrete was also investigated at 28 and 90days. The results revealed that three activation methods used in this study could improve the compressive strength of concrete made from CCR and FA mixture, with more significant effects occurring at the early age than at the later age. Increasing the fineness of a new cementing material was found be the most effective method compared with the other methods. The compressive strength of concrete activated by increasing the fineness of a new cementing material could be as high as 55.0MPa at 28days and increased to 65.1MPa at 90days. Moreover, the chloride resistance of concrete in terms of the chloride ion penetration and corrosion resistance of reinforcing steel in concrete could be considerably improved by three activation methods used in this study. (C) 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available