4.5 Article

Comparison of microstructure and property of high chromium bearing steel with and without nitrogen addition

Journal

JOURNAL OF IRON AND STEEL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 206-213

Publisher

JOURNAL IRON STEEL RESEARCH EDITORIAL BOARD
DOI: 10.1016/S1006-706X(17)30029-8

Keywords

Nitrogen addition; High temperature tempering; High hardness; Austenite grain size; Carbide; Wear resistance; High chromium hearing steel

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51371057]
  2. International Project Collaboration between CISRI (P. R. China)
  3. COMTES FHT a. s (Czech Republic)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microstructure and property of hearing steel with and without nitrogen addition were investigated by microstructural observation and hardness measurement after different heat treatment processing. Based on the microstructural observation of both 9Cr18 steel and X90N steel, it was found that nitrogen addition could effectively reduce the amount and size of coarse carbides and also refine the original austenite grain size. Due to addition of nitrogen, more austenite phase was found in X9ON steel than in 9Cr18 steel. The retained austenite of X90N steel after quenching at 1 050 degrees C could be reduced from about 60% to about 7% by cold treatment at -73 degrees C and subsequent tempering, and thus finally increased the hardness up to 60 HRC after low temperature tempering and to 63 HRC after high temperature tempering. Furthermore, both the wear and corrosion resistance of X90N steel were found much more superior than those of 9Cr18 steel, which was attributed to the addition of nitrogen. It was proposed at last that nitrogen alloying into the high chromium hearing steel was a promising way not only to refine the size of both carbides and austenite, but also to achieve high hardness, high wear property and improved corrosion resistance of the stainless hearing steel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available