4.3 Article

Retrospective analysis of premedication, glucocorticosteroids, and H1-antihistamines for preventing infusion reactions associated with cetuximab treatment of patients with head and neck cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 1378-1385

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0300060517713531

Keywords

Cetuximab; infusion reactions; monoclonal antibodies; prophylaxis; head and neck cancer

Funding

  1. National Cancer Center Hospital East

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives We evaluated infusion-related reactions associated with cetuximab combination chemotherapy comprising an H1-receptor antagonist plus dexamethasone as anti-allergy premedications for patients with head and neck cancer. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 248 patients who received a cetuximab combination regimen between December 2012 and August 2015. All patients received 5mg intravenous dichlorpheniramine (H1-receptor antagonist), and dexamethasone (DEX) was adjusted from 6.6mg to 13.2mg according to the emetogenic risk. Results We identified 248 subjects, including 13 (5.2%) with infusion-related reactions (grade 1 in five [2.0%], grade 2 in seven [2.8%], and grade 4 in one [0.4%]). The incidence of these reactions in cetuximab combination regimens, each employing an H1-receptor antagonist, using a higher dose of dexamethasone (13.2mg) was not significantly lower compared with those using 6.6mg DEX (2.4% vs 8.3%, respectively; p=0.43). Twelve patients experienced infusion-related reactions associated with the first cetuximab administration, and one reaction occurred after the third administration. Conclusions The incidence of infusion-related reactions was lower compared with those of previous studies. Dexamethasone combined with an H1-receptor antagonist was useful for preventing allergic responses. The incidence of infusion-related reactions was not lower with 13.2mg dexamethasone, and 6.6mg DEX prevented infusion-related reactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available