4.7 Article

Natural History of Patients With Perilesional Edema Around Taenia solium Calcified Granulomas

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 215, Issue 7, Pages 1141-1147

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jix027

Keywords

Taenia solium; neurocysticercosis; epilepsy; brain calcifications; brain inflammation

Funding

  1. intramural National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The transient development of perilesional edema (PE) around >= 1 calcification (defined as 1 episode) occurs in about 50% of the patients with recurrent seizures in calcified neurocysticercosis (NCC). We determined the long-term clinical and radiological course of persons undergoing PE episodes. Methods. Twenty-one persons with NCC who experienced >= 1 PE episode were followed for a median of 10.6 years (range, 0.4-29.2 years). Clinical evaluations and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed at the time of suggestive symptoms and during routine follow-up. Results. PE episodes were documented 78 times, involving 50 of 729 calcifications. Episodes reoccurred in all but 3 persons. The pattern, rate, and number of episodes were variable, commonly chronic, and not significantly associated with time from treatment, number of calcifications, or sex. Seizure was the most common symptom, but almost 30% of episodes were asymptomatic and detected by MRI during routine follow-up. Persons with delayed recurrent episodes were significantly older (age, 42.3 vs 28.8 years; P =.045). Seizures continued to occur in 37.5%, and 2 persons had a severe disabling clinical course. Conclusions. The number and timing of PE episodes in individuals with calcified NCC are variable and commonly chronic, sometimes recurring over decades. A minority of patients developed significant disability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available