4.2 Article

Detection of potassium channel KIR4.1 antibodies in Multiple Sclerosis patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 445, Issue -, Pages 53-58

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2017.03.008

Keywords

KIR4.1 antibodies; Multiple sclerosis; Antigen purification; ELISA; Acceptance criteria

Funding

  1. Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla [2015/R/05, 2014/PMS/1]
  2. Fondazione per la Ricerca Biomedica, ONLUS
  3. Parkinson's UK [J-1402] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of KIR4.1 antibodies has been proposed to be a characteristic of Multiple Sclerosis (MS). This could have a significant impact on disease management. However, the validation of the initial findings has failed till date. Conflicting results have been attributed to difficulties in isolating the lower-glycosylated (LG) KIR4.1 expressed in oligodendrocytes, the putative target antigen of autoantibodies. The aim of this study is to verify the presence of KIR4.1 antibodies in MS patients, by independently replicating the originally-described procedure. Assay procedure consisted of KIR4.1 expression in HEK293 cells, 3-step elution to isolate LG-IGR4.1 in elution fraction 3, and ELISA. Sera of 48 MS patients and 46 HCs were studied in 21 working sessions. In a preliminary analysis, we observed different KIR4.1 antibody levels between MS patients and Healthy Controls (HCs). However, a high variability across working sessions was observed and the sensitivity of the assay was very low. Thus, stringent criteria were established in order to identify working sessions in which the pure LG-KIR4.1 was isolated. As per these criteria, we detected LG-I0124.1 antibodies in 28% of MS patients and 5% of HCs. Unlike previous findings, this study is in agreement with the original report. We propose further efforts be made towards the development of a uniform method to establish the detection of KIR4.1 antibodies in MS patients. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available