4.7 Article

Discovering historical rainfall erosivity with a parsimonious approach: A case study in Western Germany

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 544, Issue -, Pages 1-9

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.023

Keywords

Long-term reconstruction; Parsimonious modelling; Rainfall erosivity

Funding

  1. European Community [KBBE.2013.1.4-09, 613817.2013-2016]
  2. Innovationsfonds - Anpassung an den Klimawandel in NRW

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An in-depth analysis of the interannual variability of storms is required to detect changes in soil erosive power of rainfall, which can also result in severe on-site and off-site damages. Evaluating long-term rainfall erosivity is a challenging task, mainly because of the paucity of high-resolution historical precipitation observations that are generally reported at coarser temporal resolutions (e.g., monthly to annual totals). In this paper we suggest overcoming this limitation through an analysis of long-term processes governing rainfall erosivity with an application to datasets available the central Ruhr region (Western Germany) for the period 1701-2011. Based on a parsimonious interpretation of seasonal rainfall-related processes (from spring to autumn), a model was derived using 5-min erosivity data from 10 stations covering the period 1937-2002, and then used to reconstruct a long series of annual rainfall erosivity values. Change-points in the evolution of rainfall erosivity are revealed over the 1760s and the 1920s that mark three sub-periods characterized by increasing mean values. The results indicate that the erosive hazard tends to increase as a consequence of an increased frequency of extreme precipitation events occurred during the last decades, characterized by short-rain events regrouped into prolonged wet spells. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available