4.7 Article

Effect of emplaced nZVI mass and groundwater velocity on PCE dechlorination and hydrogen evolution in water-saturated sand

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 322, Issue -, Pages 136-144

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.037

Keywords

Nanoiron; Environmental nanotechnology; In situ remediation; DNAPL; Groundwater treatment

Funding

  1. U.S. EPA [R833326]
  2. NSF [BES-068646, EF-0830093]
  3. Department of Defense through the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program [W912HQ-06-C-0038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of nZVI mass loading and groundwater velocity on the tetrachloroethylene (PCE) dechlorination rate and the hydrogen evolution rate for poly(maleic acid-co-olefin) (MW = 12 K) coated nZVI was examined. In batch reactors, the PCE reaction rate constant (3.7 x 10(-4) L hr(-1) m(-2)) and hydrogen evolution rate constant (1.4 nanomol L hr(-1) m(-2)) were independent of nZVI concentration above 10 g/L, but the PCE dechlorination rate decreased and the hydrogen evolution rate increased for nZVI concentration below 10 g/L. The nonlinearity between nZVI mass loading and PCE dechlorination and H-2 evolution was explained by differences in pH and Eh at each nZVI mass loading; PCE reactivity increased When solution Eh decreased, and the H-2 evolution rate increased with decreasing pH. Thus, nZVI mass loading of <5 g/L yields lower reactivity with PCE and lower efficiency of Fe utilization than for higher nZVI mass loading. The PCE dechlorination rate increased with increasing pore-water velocity, suggesting that mass transfer limits the reaction at low porewater velocity. Overall, this work suggests that design of nZVI-based reactive barriers for groundwater treatment should consider the non-linear effects of both mass loading and flow velocity on performance and expected reactive lifetime. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available