4.4 Article

Seasonal control of Petermann Gletscher ice-shelf melt by the ocean's response to sea-ice cover in Nares

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 238, Pages 324-330

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2016.140

Keywords

basal melt ice shelf; landfast sea ice; Nares Strait; ocean/glacier interactions; ocean/ice interactions; Petermann Gletscher; sea-ice arching

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [ARC-1108463, ark:/85065/d7wd3xhc]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX15AL77G, NNX13AP60G]
  3. Directorate For Geosciences
  4. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [1604076] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Petermann Gletscher drains similar to 4% of the Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) area, with similar to 80% of its mass loss occurring by basal melting of its ice shelf. We use a high-resolution coupled ocean and sea-ice model with a thermodynamic glacial ice shelf to diagnose ocean-controlled seasonality in basal melting of the Petermann ice shelf. Basal melt rates increase by similar to 20% in summer due to a seasonal shift in ocean circulation within Nares Strait that is associated with the transition from landfast sea ice to mobile sea ice. Under landfast ice, cold near-surface waters are maintained on the eastern side of the strait and within Petermann Fjord, reducing basal melt and insulating the ice shelf. Under mobile sea ice, warm waters are upwelled on the eastern side of the strait and, mediated by local instabilities and eddies, enter Petermann Fjord, enhancing basal melt down to depths of 200 m. The transition between these states occurs rapidly, and seasonal changes within Nares Strait are conveyed into the fjord within the same season. These results suggest that long-term changes in the length of the landfast sea-ice season will substantially alter the structure of Petermann ice shelf and its contribution to GrIS mass loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available