4.7 Article

A non-signaling role of Robo2 in tendons is essential for Slit processing and muscle patterning

Journal

DEVELOPMENT
Volume 142, Issue 20, Pages 3512-3518

Publisher

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.128157

Keywords

Drosophila embryo; Muscle; Robo; Slit; Slit cleavage

Funding

  1. Israeli Science Foundation (ISF) [71/12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coordinated locomotion of an organism relies on the development of proper musculoskeletal connections. In Drosophila, the Slit-Robo signaling pathway guides muscles to tendons. Here, we show that the Slit receptor Roundabout 2 (Robo2) plays a non-cell-autonomous role in directing muscles to their corresponding tendons. Robo2 is expressed by tendons, and its non-signaling activity in these cells promotes Slit cleavage, producing a cleaved Slit N-terminal guidance signal that provides short-range signaling into muscles. Consistently, robo2 mutant embryos exhibited a muscle phenotype similar to that of slit, which could not be rescued by muscle-specific Robo2 expression but rather by ectodermally derived Robo2. Alternatively, this muscle phenotype could be induced by tendon-specific robo2 RNAi. We further show that membrane immobilization of Slit or its N-terminal cleaved form (Slit-N) on tendons bypasses the functional requirement for Robo2 in tendons, verifying that the major role of Robo2 is to promote the association of Slit with the tendon cell membrane. Slit-N tends to oligomerize whereas full-length uncleavable Slit does not. It is therefore proposed that Slit-N oligomers, produced at the tendon membrane by Robo2, signal to the approaching muscle by combined Robo1 and Robo3 activity. These findings establish a Robo2-mediated mechanism, independent of signaling, that is essential to limiting Slit distribution and which might be relevant to the regulation of Slit-mediated short-range signaling in additional systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available