4.6 Article

Structural, Thermal, Physical, Mechanical, and Barrier Properties of Chitosan Films with the Addition of Xanthan Gum

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages 698-705

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.13653

Keywords

chitosan; films; mechanical properties; structural properties; xanthan gum

Funding

  1. Chamada Publica MCT/CNPq/MEC/CAPES [06/2011, 552197/2011-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Films based on chitosan and xanthan gum were prepared using casting technique aiming to investigate the potential of these polymers as packaging materials. Six formulations of films were studied varying the proportion of chitosan and xanthan gum: 100: 0 (chitosan: xanthan gum, w/w, C100XG0 film); 90: 10 (chitosan: xanthan gum, w/w, C90XG10 film); 80: 20 (chitosan: xanthan gum, w/w, C80XG20 film); 70: 30 (chitosan: xanthan gum, w/w, C70XG30 film); 60: 40 (chitosan: xanthan gum, w/w, C60XG40 film); and 50: 50 (chitosan: xanthan gum, w/w, C50XG50 film). The total quantity of solids (chitosan and xanthan gum) in the filmogenic solution was 1.5 g per 100 mL of aqueous solution for all treatments, according to the proportion of each polymer. The films were evaluated by their functional groups, structural, thermal, morphological, physical, mechanical, and barrier properties. All films have presented endothermic peaks in the range of 122 to 175 degrees C and broad exothermic peaks above 200 degrees C, which were assigned to the melting temperature and thermal decomposition, respectively. These results demonstrated that films with xanthan gum have the highest T-m and Delta H-m. The films containing higher content of xanthan gum show also the highest tensile strength and the lowest elongation. Xanthan gum addition did not affect the water vapor permeability, solubility, and moisture of films. This set of data suggests the formation of chitosan-xanthan complexes in the films.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available