4.7 Article

Loss of photosynthetic efficiency in the shade. An Achilles heel for the dense modern stands of our most productive C4 crops?

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 335-345

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw456

Keywords

C-4 photosynthesis; canopy photosynthesis; corn; crop photosynthesis; crop yield; food security; maize; miscanthus; quantum yield; shade acclimation; planting density

Categories

Funding

  1. Energy Biosciences Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The wild progenitors of major C-4 crops grew as individuals subjected to little shading. Today they are grown in dense stands where most leaves are shaded. Do they maintain photosynthetic efficiency in these low light conditions produced by modern cultivation? The apparent maximum quantum yield of CO2 assimilation (Phi(CO2max,app)), a key determinant of light-limited photosynthesis, has not been systematically studied in field stands of C-4 crops. Phi(CO2max,app) was derived from the initial slope of the response of leaf CO2 uptake (A) to photon flux (Q). Leaf fractional light absorptance (a) was measured to determine the absolute maximum quantum yield of CO2 assimilation on an absorbed light basis (Phi(CO2max,abs)). Light response curves were determined on sun and shade leaves of 49 field plants of Miscanthus x giganteus and Zea mays following canopy closure. Phi(CO2max,app) and Phi(CO2max,abs) declined significantly by 15-27% (P<0.05) with canopy depth. Experimentally, leaf age was shown unlikely to cause this loss. Modeling canopy CO2 assimilation over diurnal courses suggested that the observed decline in Phi(CO2max,app) with canopy depth costs 10% of potential carbon gain. Overcoming this limitation could substantially increase the productivity of major C-4 crops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available