4.2 Article

Chemical Characterization and Nematicidal Activity of the Essential Oil of Nepeta nuda L. ssp pubescens and Nepeta curviflora Boiss. from Lebanon

Journal

JOURNAL OF ESSENTIAL OIL BEARING PLANTS
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 1424-1433

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0972060X.2017.1407678

Keywords

Aromatic plants; nematodes; isoprenoids; biopesticides; anthelmintics

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical characterization and the nematicidal activity of the essential oils from Nepeta nuda L. ssp. pubescens and Nepeta curviflora Boiss. growing wild in Lebanon are reported. A comparative study was carried out as, to the best of our knowledge, no information is available on Nepeta nuda L. ssp. pubescens. In addition, both Nepeta species were collected in the same geographical area in order to rule out the environmental factors influencing essential oil composition and bioactivity. The most abundant (> 5 %) components of N. nuda ssp. pubescens essential oil were pinene (12.89 %), 1-ethyl-1H-pyrrole (12.67 %), 1-cycloethyl- 1-(2-methylenecyclohexyl) ethanol (10.37 %), 3-methyl-2-cyclohexen-1-one (9.17 %) and 2,3-dimethyl-3- hexanol (5.88 %). Among oxygenated monoterpenes, two nepetalactones were identified, i.e. (E, Z)nepetalactone (2.24 %) and (Z, E)-nepetalactone (0.31 %). The major constituents (> 5 %) of N. curviflora essential oil were 2-isopropyl-5-methyl-3-cyclohexen-1-one (12.51%), (-)-spathulenol (11.73%), cis-Z-alpha-bisabolene epoxide (8.07 %), widdrol (7.0 %), (E, Z)-5,7-dodecadiene (6.93 %), dihydronepetalactone (5.57 %) and 4-propyl-cyclohexene (5.43 %). The essential oil of N. curviflora was more active than the N. nuda ssp. pubescens one against the nematode Panagrolaimus rigidus. According to the motility assay, LD50 was 0.5 mg/mL and 2.5 mg/mL 24 h after treatment with N. curviflora and N. nuda ssp. pubescens essential oil, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available