4.7 Article

Evaluation of heavy crude oil from a water-oil model system as starting material for the preparation of adsorbents type NaY zeolite-templated carbon

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 196, Issue -, Pages 466-475

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.049

Keywords

Mesoporous carbons; ZTC materials; Heavy oil; NaY zeolite; Oil-water model

Funding

  1. Universidad del Norte [UN-OJ-2013-22022, 2013-DI0024]
  2. Colciencias [UN-OJ-2013-22022, 2013-DI0024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, NaY zeolite is explored as a possible template to obtain porous materials type ZTC from the adsorption of heavy crude oil in a water-oil model system (emulsion). In order to produce the adsorbents, a cationic surfactant is selected to facilitate the adsorption of the crude oil into the pores of the zeolite and to get the composite, which was activated with controlled thermal treatments (T: 700 -800 degrees C and t: 0.5-1 h) in inert conditions (N-2 gaseous). The starting materials, composite and porous carbons were characterized using structural/surface analysis techniques (API Gravity, SARA, IR, XRD, XRF, TGA, Langmuir isotherms, BET and SEM). The results showed that four types of mesoporous carbons were produced with specific surface areas between 70 +/- 1 m(2)/g and 220 +/- 3 m(2)/g, average pore volumes between 0.144 cm(3)/g and 0.40 cm(3)/g and average pore widths between 4.9 nm and 8.3 nm. The activation conditions of 800 degrees C and 1 h allowed to make the carbonaceous material with the best surface characteristics (220 +/- 3 m(2)/g, 0.27 cm(3)/g, and 4.9 nm). Therefore, it is concluded that under assay conditions employed, the heavy crude oil, as a mixed model (water-oil), from an aqueous environment is a starting material suitable for preparation of mesoporous carbons. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available