4.6 Article

Cold Hardiness of Overwintering Larvae of Sphenoptera sp (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in Western China

Journal

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages 247-251

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jee/tox304

Keywords

Sphenoptera sp.; overwintering larvae; supercooling point; low temperature mortality; cold hardiness

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31470651]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An undetermined species of Sphenoptera sp. is an important pest of Artemisia ordosica Krasch, and recently, an outbreak of this insect has spread throughout Ningxia, Inner Mongolia, Shanxi, and other regions in western China. The cold hardiness of overwintering larvae of Sphenoptera sp. was determined by measuring their supercooling point (SCP) and their mortality at sub-zero temperatures. Additionally, quantitative changes in sugars and low molecular weight sugar alcohols in larvae were determined following exposure of larvae to low temperatures. Mean SCP of overwintering larvae (i.e., collected in January) was -30.2 +/- 0.60 degrees C. The mortality rate of larvae approached 100% at -30 degrees C, whereas mortality rates of larvae in the higher temperature treatments were generally less than 25%. Five sugars and sugar alcohols (i.e., glycerol, fructose, glucose, inositol, and trehalose) were detected in larvae. When larvae were exposed to low temperatures for 4 h, inositol, trehalose and total content was generally higher at the highest incubation temperature (-10 degrees C) than at lower incubation temperatures. Following a longer exposure (30 d), content of fructose, glucose, trehalose and total content generally increased with decreasing temperature down to -25 degrees C. Thus it appears that Sphenoptera sp. larvae are freeze avoidant, and their cold hardiness may be achieved by accumulation low molecular weight sugars and sugar alcohols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available