Impact of Selection Bias on Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Randomized Trials of Oral Health Interventions: A Meta-epidemiological Study
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Impact of Selection Bias on Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Randomized Trials of Oral Health Interventions: A Meta-epidemiological Study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages 5-13
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Online
2017-08-17
DOI
10.1177/0022034517725049
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Evaluation of risk of bias assessment of trials in systematic reviews of oral health interventions, 1991-2014
- (2016) Humam Saltaji et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
- Design and Validity of Randomized Controlled Dental Restorative Trials
- (2016) Gerd Göstemeyer et al. Materials
- Testing for baseline differences in randomized controlled trials: an unhealthy research behavior that is hard to eradicate
- (2015) Michiel R de Boer et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Effect of Risk of Bias on the Effect Size of Meta-Analytic Estimates in Randomized Controlled Trials in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry
- (2015) Clovis Mariano Faggion et al. PLoS One
- Assessing baseline comparability in randomised trials
- (2015) Mark R Elkins Journal of Physiotherapy
- What is the influence of randomisation sequence generation and allocation concealment on treatment effects of physical therapy trials? A meta-epidemiological study
- (2015) Susan Armijo-Olivo et al. BMJ Open
- Selection-related bias, an ongoing concern in doing and publishing research
- (2014) J. André Knottnerus et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Quantifying Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials in Child Health: A Meta-Epidemiological Study
- (2014) Lisa Hartling et al. PLoS One
- Methodological characteristics and treatment effect sizes in oral health randomised controlled trials: Is there a relationship? Protocol for a meta-epidemiological study
- (2014) Humam Saltaji et al. BMJ Open
- Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials
- (2013) Jelena Savović et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- A Descriptive Analysis of Oral Health Systematic Reviews Published 1991–2012: Cross Sectional Study
- (2013) Humam Saltaji et al. PLoS One
- Effect and Reporting Bias of RhoA/ROCK-Blockade Intervention on Locomotor Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury
- (2013) Ralf Watzlawick et al. JAMA Neurology
- The effect size
- (2012) Nikolaos Pandis AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
- Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols
- (2012) Rahul Mhaskar et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The importance of allocation concealment and patient blinding in osteoarthritis trials: A meta-epidemiologic study
- (2009) Eveline Nüesch et al. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
- Empirical Evidence of an Association Between Internal Validity and Effect Size in Randomized Controlled Trials of Low-Back Pain
- (2009) Maurits W. van Tulder et al. SPINE
- The effect of bias on the magnitude of clinical outcomes in periodontology: a pilot study
- (2008) Julie Fenwick et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
- (2008) Lesley Wood et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started