4.5 Article

Temporomandibular joint reconstruction with stock and custom-made devices: Indications and results of a 14-year experience

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 45, Issue 10, Pages 1710-1715

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.07.011

Keywords

TMJ; Ankyloses; Temporomandibular joint; Prosthesis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) reconstruction with alloplastic implants is a reliable, safe and effective treatment option for selected debilitating pathologies of the TMJ. This study retrospectively analyzes our 14-year experience in total alloplastic reconstruction of the TMJ using stock and custom Biomet prostheses. Indications, results and rationale for the choice of stock and custom-made devices are discussed. Material and methods: Patients were enrolled in the study who underwent single-stage alloplastic total joint replacement from January 2000 to October 2014. The subjective and objective variables were as follows: TMJ pain, diet, jaw function, maximum interincisal opening (MIO), quality of life and occlusion. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. Results: A total of 38 patients (55 joints) met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Of the patients, 25 underwent Biomet total joint reconstruction system with stock prosthesis, 12 patients underwent total joint reconstruction system with custom made (patient matched) prosthesis, and 1 patient underwent bilateral total joint reconstruction using stock system on one side and custom system on the other side. The following adverse events and complications were recorded: bleeding, 2 cases; malocclusion, 1 case; postoperative infection with prosthesis removal, 1 case; heterotopic bone formation, 1 case; and contralateral TMJ overload in unilateral cases, 1 case. The occlusion was habitual unchanged in 29 of 38 cases. In 1 patient occlusion worsened with less stable functional contact. The patient refused postoperative orthodontic treatment. In 8 patients, a concomitant orthognatic procedure was planned in order to improve the occlusion. In all these patients, the occlusion improved. Quality of life and MIO relevantly improved in all cases. Conclusions: This study supports the use of total joint reconstruction for end-stage TMJ disease. Both stock and custom implants allow consistent results, but there are precise indications for the use of custom implants. (C) 2017 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available