4.3 Article

Reuse of alum sludge for phosphorus removal from municipal wastewater

Journal

DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT
Volume 57, Issue 28, Pages 13246-13254

Publisher

DESALINATION PUBL
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1055806

Keywords

Alum sludge; Wastewater; Orthophosphorous; Condensed phosphorus; Adsorption

Funding

  1. Institute of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the efficiency of alum sludge for removing phosphorus from synthetic and municipal wastewater (MWW) was investigated. Orthophosphorus (OP) and condensed phosphorus (CP) were used as model pollutants. Alum sludge (A and B) from two local treatment plants was collected, dewatered, dried, and processed before use. Batch experiments were performed to determine OP and CP removal under equilibrium conditions. Sludge dose, contact time, and pH were optimized for both sludges. Adsorption efficiencies of OP and CP were determined by using Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherm models. The maximum adsorption capacity (Q(o)) for sludge A was found to be 4.86mg/g for OP, and 4.21mg/g for CP at 12g/L of sludge dose, 90min of contact time, and pH 4. For sludge B, Q(o) was 1.58mg/g for OP and 4.71mg/g for CP at 30g/L of sludge dose, 80min of contact time, and pH of 5.5. Results showed that pH of wastewater significantly affected adsorption capacity and better removal was achieved within pH range of 4.0-5.5. Optimized conditions for sludge A and B were applied on MWW which provided over 90% of OP and 70-80% of CP removal. Sludge B performed better than sludge A in case of domestic wastewater. This study concluded that alum sludge as being a great resource for phosphorus removal from wastewater, and could be applied to streams feeding water supply reservoirs for prolonged oligotrophic conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available