4.6 Article

Limited diagnostic value of a multiplexed gastrointestinal pathogen panel for the detection of adenovirus infection in an oncology patient population

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 37-41

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.07.002

Keywords

Adenovirus; Genotypes; Gastroenteritis; Multiplexed molecular panel; Cancer patients

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 [CA008748]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Diagnosis of Adenovirus infections in transplant patients may be accomplished using either plasma or stool samples. IVD-cleared multiplexed gastrointestinal (GI) PCR panels offer an option for rapid testing of stool samples but most only target Adenovirus (HAdV) types F40/41. Objectives: Given the potential significance of a positive adenovirus test in an immunocompromised patient, we sought to determine the frequency of type 40/41 in our patient population and the utility of a readily available multiplexed, FDA-cleared GI Panel for the detection of adenovirus infections. Study design: A total of 215 specimens from immunocompromised patients mostly with hematologic malignancy or transplant recipients were evaluated including 107 plasma samples, 85 stool samples and 23 respiratory samples. Genotyping was performed successfully on 122 specimens. Results: The most common type detected in all samples including stools was Adenovirus C/2. In a subset of patients with multiple specimen types tested, similar types were detected in all samples. Conclusions: Although Adenovirus F40/41 is the most common enteric type, Adenovirus C/2 was the most common type identified in stools and subsequently plasma samples of our patient population. Implementation of assays that have wide reactivity for most adenovirus types is essential for optimal diagnostic yield.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available