4.3 Article

Role for loss of nuclear PTEN in a harbinger of brain metastases

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 44, Issue -, Pages 148-154

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.004

Keywords

Brain metastasis; PTEN; Subcellular localization; PDK1

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16K10757]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K10757] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Earlier studies proposed phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) acts as a 3'-specific phosphatidylinositol phosphatase and inhibits the PI3K pathway. Recent reports show that PTEN mRNA expression is significantly downregulated in brain metastases compared to primary breast cancer. We focused on the differential expression of nuclear and cytoplasmic PTEN between primary tumors and brain metastases. Materials and methods: We retrospectively studied 30 patients with histologically confirmed primary tumors and brain metastases. PTEN and PDK1 expression levels were examined by immunohistochemical staining and categorized as negative, positive, or strong positive expression. The difference in PTEN expression levels were compared, and the values with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Expression of cytoplasmic PTEN was 100% at primary site, and 70% at brain metastases. Expression of nuclear PTEN was 87% at primary site, and 20% at brain metastases. Study results demonstrated that PTEN expression levels in brain metastases are lower compared with that of primary tumors. Especially, nuclear PTEN expression was significantly downregulated in various brain metastases. Higher PDK1 expression at brain metastases also confirmed the down regulation of PTEN function. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that decreased PTEN function by loss of nuclear PTEN expression may be associated with brain metastases. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available