4.3 Article

Role of cathepsin K in the development of chronic subdural hematoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages 343-347

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.08.021

Keywords

Cathepsin K; Cerebrospinal fluid; Chronic inflammation; Chronic subdural hematoma; Hypoxia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite extensive investigations, the process of development of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is not known. The present study aims to investigate CSDH by measuring biomarkers in it, gas analysis, and immunohistochemical examination. A total of 42 patients with symptomatic CSDH who underwent burr-hole drainage were enrolled. Intraoperatively, hematoma fluid and peripheral venous blood (PVCSDH) were simultaneously collected. As controls, peripheral venous blood (PVControl) and intracranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were collected from other subjects during other surgeries. CatK, lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase (PGDS), and cystatin C (CysC) present in these specimens were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Data obtained were statistically analyzed after age correction. In 15 patients, gas analysis was performed for CSDH and PVCSDH. Furthermore, immunohistochemical examination for the outer membrane was performed for four patients. CatK, PGDS, and CysC levels were markedly elevated in the CSF and CSDH. CatK levels in PVCSDH were significantly higher than in PVControl (P < 0.0001). In contrast, CysC levels in PVCSDH were significantly lower than in PVControl (P = 0.004). The gas analysis revealed that the internal environment of CSDH is characterized by marked hypoxia, hypoglycemia, and lactic acidosis. Furthermore, the outer membrane consistently showed a diffuse staining for CatK. Based on these, CatK was thought to play a role in the development of CSDH, with the levels in peripheral venous blood elevated in patients with CSDH. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available